The Barnes & Noble NOligarchy Profile
T
R
U
S
T
E
D
Barnes & Noble earns a NOligarchy Score of 79.64 out of 100 for the period spanning Q3 2024 through Q2 2026 (8 quarters — the two-year tracking period). That score is built from three separate grades covering political spending, executive wealth extraction, and legal compliance.
Current Pillar Scores
Political Access
95.7
Wealth Extraction
35.9
Playing by the Rules
100.0
Score history — 23 quarters
Tier bands show where each quarter's score falls — no numeric y-axis needed. The dashed ring marks the year-over-year comparison point. Tap any quarter but the first to see its pillar breakdown.
•
Political Access Grade: 95.7/100. This reflects zero reported federal lobbying spending and zero Political Action Committee (PAC) contributions, offset only slightly by a small trail of individual campaign donations tied to company executives.
•
Wealth Extraction Grade: 35.94/100. This reflects no recorded stock buyback or dividend spending, combined with an estimated executive pay gap — drawn from industry benchmarks rather than the company’s own disclosures — that sits significantly above the typical retail worker’s take-home pay.
•
Playing by the Rules Grade: 100.0/100. This reflects zero recorded regulatory fines or violations in the tracked public record.
The Sector Context: Barnes & Noble ranks 13 out of 15 in the Book retailers and news dealers sector, trailing the sector average score of 83.5. Barnes & Noble is the dominant player in its market by sheer size — the company generated revenue equal to 20.83% of the book-retail market tracked in this data, a level of concentration classified as “Dominant.” That combination — outsized market control paired with a below-average accountability score — is exactly the kind of imbalance where a single company’s choices carry disproportionate weight for readers, workers, and competitors alike.
The Bottom Line: A Private Giant With a Shrinking Accountability Score
Barnes & Noble reported $3.55 billion in revenue in its last SEC filing before going private — roughly the scale of a large regional retail chain — yet the public record shows the company spending nothing on federal lobbying, corporate PAC contributions, stock buybacks, or dividends. The score drop since last quarter traces almost entirely to a revised industry benchmark for executive compensation: the best available estimate of Barnes & Noble’s CEO pay gap has been updated to 406:1, a figure that now weighs heavily on the Wealth Extraction grade. As a private company, Barnes & Noble faces far lighter disclosure obligations than publicly traded retailers, which limits how much of its actual pay and capital decisions are visible to the public at all.
A Minimal Footprint in Washington
Barnes & Noble’s Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings show no registered federal lobbying spending, and the company reported zero dollars in corporate PAC contributions during the two-year period. On paper, Barnes & Noble is not paying lobbyists to push its priorities in Congress and is not funding a corporate PAC to direct money into federal campaigns.
The record isn’t entirely blank, however. Federal Election Commission (FEC) data shows $3,380 in individual campaign contributions from people who listed Barnes & Noble as their employer, spread across six quarters between Q3 2024 and Q1 2026. These are personal donations tied to individuals, not corporate spending directed by the company itself, and the amounts — ranging from $250 to $875 per quarter — are small compared to the lobbying and PAC totals posted by larger retailers.
An Estimated Pay Gap With No Payout Data to Match
Barnes & Noble’s CEO pay ratio is not publicly disclosed. Because the company is privately held, it is not required to file the executive compensation disclosures that publicly traded companies must submit. The best available figure is 406:1, based on AFL-CIO Executive Paywatch industry benchmarks for comparable companies in this sector, cited via AFL-CIO Executive Paywatch. That means the industry benchmark suggests the person running Barnes & Noble takes home, in a single year, what a typical frontline bookseller would need more than four centuries to earn. The ratio is an estimate built from sector averages — not a number drawn from the company’s own filings — but it is the closest proxy the public record offers.
No stock buyback or dividend data is recorded for Barnes & Noble over the two-year period, so there is no way to calculate a missed raise, a dividend comparison, or an executive-bonus link tied to share repurchases. The absence of these figures reflects what is visible in the public record for a private company, not a confirmed absence of shareholder payouts.
A Clean Record on the Public Docket
The tracked public record shows zero regulatory fines or violations tied to Barnes & Noble over the two-year tracking period, from Q3 2024 through Q2 2026. This window represents a fraction of the company’s full docket on the source site, so it should be read as a snapshot of recent activity rather than a complete lifetime record.
At the same time that no fines appear in the record, Barnes & Noble collected $43,925 in public subsidies across two grants covering 2024 and 2025. The larger of the two, worth $42,379 in 2025, made up the bulk of that total, with a smaller $1,546 grant in 2024. Both grants originated in New Jersey. These are government dollars flowing to the company, tracked separately from the fines and violations record.