The OnePlus NOligarchy Profile
T
R
U
S
T
E
D
NOligarchy Score
89.2
/ 100
oneplus.com
0
Subsidiary of BBK Electronics
OnePlus carries a NOligarchy Score of 89.32 out of 100 — where 100 represents zero political spending, no executive pay gap, and a clean compliance record. That score reflects a company that, based on currently available public records, leaves a notably small footprint across the three pillars this project tracks.
Current Pillar Scores
BBK Electronics (parent company) has no federal lobbying or PAC spending of its own — Political Access reflects this company's own filings only. Wealth Extraction and Playing by the Rules reflect this company directly.
Political Access
100.0
Wealth Extraction
69.2
Playing by the Rules
100.0
Score history — 23 quarters
Tier bands show where each quarter's score falls — no numeric y-axis needed. The dashed ring marks the year-over-year comparison point. Tap any quarter but the first to see its pillar breakdown.
•
Political Access Grade: 100/100. No federal lobbying spend and no corporate PAC activity are recorded for OnePlus or its parent, BBK Electronics, across the sources this project tracks.
•
Wealth Extraction Grade: 69.5/100. No stock buyback or dividend data is recorded. The score is shaped primarily by an industry-benchmark estimate of the gap between executive and worker pay.
•
Playing by the Rules Grade: 100/100. No regulatory fines or penalties are recorded against OnePlus in the tracked sources.
The Sector Context: OnePlus ranks 2nd out of 12 among companies sharing its federal industry classification (Computer & Electronic Product Manufacturing). Its score of 89.32 sits substantially above the sector average of 64.3 — placing it as an accountability outlier relative to most companies in this classification.
The Bottom Line: No Public-Record Data Has Been Matched to OnePlus
From Q3 2024 through Q2 2026 (8 quarters — the two-year tracking period), no lobbying filings, Political Action Committee (PAC) contributions, executive political donations, CEO pay disclosures, stock buyback records, regulatory fines, or public subsidy grants have been matched to OnePlus across any source this project tracks. This reflects the current state of available public records — not a confirmed finding of compliance, zero spending, or zero violations. As a foreign-headquartered subsidiary of BBK Electronics, OnePlus may operate in ways that fall outside standard US disclosure requirements, and matching records, if they exist, may not yet have been linked to this entity.
Outside the Current Tracking Record in Washington
The Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) database shows no federal lobbying expenditures filed under BBK Electronics — OnePlus’s parent — for the two-year period. No corporate PAC spending and no individual executive donations tied to OnePlus appear in Federal Election Commission (FEC) records. Whether this reflects a genuine absence of federal political engagement or a gap in current record-matching is not determinable from available data alone.
EXHIBIT — THE RESERVED SEAT
$0 in lobbying · $0 in PAC money
OnePlus filed no federal lobbying and ran no corporate PAC in this window — the reserved seat at the witness table sits empty.
A Pay Gap Without a Public Disclosure
OnePlus is a foreign-structured private subsidiary and is not required to publicly disclose its Chief Executive Officer pay ratio. The best available figure is 115:1, based on AFL-CIO Executive Paywatch industry benchmarks for comparable companies in this sector. That benchmark means the executive layer is estimated to take home 115 times what a typical worker in this industry earns — but because no actual disclosure exists, that figure cannot be confirmed or contested with company-specific data.
No stock buyback or dividend records are matched to OnePlus across the tracked sources. Whether the company directs cash toward shareholder returns through mechanisms not captured in available public records is not visible from current data.
Outside the Current Violation Record
No regulatory fines, penalties, or enforcement actions have been matched to OnePlus in the tracked sources for the two-year period. No public subsidy grants are recorded either. As with the other sections, this reflects the current limit of what has been matched to this company — not a verified finding that no violations or subsidies exist.
The Data Evidence
Regulatory violation data, public subsidy records, and SEC filing links are not available for OnePlus in the current dataset.